2011年6月28日星期二

U. K. Universities will have a "race to the bottom"

A race to the bottom is a socio-economic concept that is argued to occur between countries as an outcome of regulatory competition, progressive taxation policies and social welfare spending. When competition becomes fierce between nations over a particular area of trade and production, countries are given increased incentive to dismantle currently existing regulatory standards.

A race to the bottom may also occur within a country (such as between businesses, states or counties), but, in theory, this should occur less frequently, because the central government has recourse to enact legislation slowing or halting the race before its effects become too pervasive.





----

Universities will have to bid for a quarter of places

Willetts promises to put students "in the driving seat"

Universities in England will have to compete against each other and private providers for a quarter of their student places.

Universities Minister David Willetts has published plans to increase market forces in higher education in England.

Promising to put "students in the driving seat", he also announced there would be 20,000 places reserved for degrees with fees of less than £7,500.

Labour's Gareth Thomas said the plans meant a "race to the bottom".

The shadow universities minister told MPs that this was a "desperate drive to cut fees, no matter what the cost to quality".

The controversial plan to create extra places for privately-funded individuals has also resurfaced - on the basis that it will be restricted to those sponsored by a business or a charity.

There are also proposals to allow students to repay their loans early, although the government is still consulting on the detail.

This is a politically sensitive suggestion which raises the prospect of better-off students not paying as much as those who pay back their loans over several decades.

Private providers

Mr Willetts said the reform package would "open up the system" and "put power where it belongs - in the hands of students".

Analysis

The market economy in higher education will mean students have to be treated as valued customers. Because, after all, they're paying the bill.

But is the "customer is always right" the best starting point for a university system?

University leaders have raised concerns about instilling instability rather than competitive energy.

If a subject falls out of fashion for a couple of years, should be it be abandoned?

Rather than wanting to compete for extra places, some university leaders talk privately about retreating to a smaller number of subject areas where they know they can attract a reliable number of students.

It's a move from the supermarket to the boutique.

And universities want to be places of ideas, ideals and academic excellence, but they also need to attract young people willing and able to pay up to £9,000 per year.

Are they going to be trading in lifestyle and leisure experiences as much as the old-fashioned currency of learning?

This White Paper promises to put the students into the driving seat of higher education - but it can't control where they are going to take it.

The White Paper, called Students at the Heart of the System, details plans to make universities bid for a proportion of their places - a higher proportion than had been anticipated.

This raises the prospect that while some universities will expand, others will lose student places.

Mr Willetts said that no government could offer a guarantee that courses or even institutions might not close as a result.

This proportion of universities bidding for places is "just the start", said Mr Willetts. "We want to extend the system so more places are contestable."

From 2012, universities will be able to offer unlimited places for students achieving AAB grades at A-level or better - regardless of the total student quotas they have been allocated.

This will encourage top universities to compete for the 65,000 students each year who attain these grades.

There will also be 20,000 places allocated on the basis of "good quality" and "value for money" at institutions charging an average of £7,500 or less per year.

Since a high proportion of universities have announced fees above this level, these places could be taken by an expanded private sector or courses provided through further education colleges.

Sir Steve Smith, president of the vice-chancellors' body Universities UK, warned that this "must not undermine the quality of the higher education system".

University title

In terms of improving social mobility, there had been discussion of changing the admissions system to allow applications after students knew their exam results - which previous official reports had recommended as fairer.

UNIVERSITY CHANGES

  • Universities to compete for 65,000 places for pupils with AAB grades at A-level
  • 20,000 places reserved for degrees with fees of £7,500 or less
  • Universities will have to publish information about students' employment chances and salaries
  • Inspections triggered if concerns raised about teaching standards
  • Student charter setting out consumer rights
  • Wider role for private sector colleges and partnerships
  • Fewer restrictions on "university" title
  • Considering options on early loan repayments

But a decision on this - so-called "post qualification application" - will not be considered until a review reports back next year.

The White Paper also promises to reduce barriers to private providers entering higher education.

This includes a review of the use of the term "university" as a title.

And there will be an emphasis on improving the information available to students.

Last week the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) announced that universities would have to publish key information about courses, such as the average salary of former students, the cost of accommodation, teaching hours and satisfaction ratings from previous students.

There will also be plans for inspections to be triggered if there are concerns about the quality of courses or teaching standards.

'Potential chaos'

But students were unimpressed.

Aaron Porter, president of the National Union of Students said: "Fees have been tripled and students have been exposed to the potential chaos of the market and yet there are still no concrete proposals for how quality, accountability and access will be improved."

University change will lead to higher drop out rate in England says Labour

Lecturers also attacked the proposals as an attempt by the government to recover from having lost control of fee levels.

"Trying to force down the cost of a degree after the government got its sums wrong will not solve the funding crisis it created," said Sally Hunt, leader of the University and College Union.

Professor Les Ebdon, chair of university think-tank Million+ said there was no evidence that competition would improve the student experience.

"A mini-market in 'AAB' students could favour students from independent schools and actually constrain a university's ability to widen access," he said.

Dr Wendy Piatt, of the Russell Group of leading universities, said she agreed that universities with high demand for courses from highly-qualified students should be allowed to expand.

But she warned that "such a very selective" lifting of the places cap could make it harder for some universities to maintain teaching in strategically important subjects like sciences and languages.

Professor Paul Welling, of the 1994 group of research intensive universities, said the government needed to avoid driving down standards by auctioning students to low cost institutions.

"We should not encourage higher education providers to short change students by cutting corners."

Competition on price will not affect Scottish students in Scotland's universities where there are no tuition fees. In Wales there are plans for Welsh students at Welsh universities to receive a subsidy covering increased tuition fees.

A decision on tuition fees and support for students at Northern Ireland's universities is expected in the autumn.

U. K. Universities will have a "race to the bottom"

A race to the bottom is a socio-economic concept that is argued to occur between countries as an outcome of regulatory competition, progressive taxation policies and social welfare spending. When competition becomes fierce between nations over a particular area of trade and production, countries are given increased incentive to dismantle currently existing regulatory standards.

A race to the bottom may also occur within a country (such as between businesses, states or counties), but, in theory, this should occur less frequently, because the central government has recourse to enact legislation slowing or halting the race before its effects become too pervasive.





----

Universities will have to bid for a quarter of places

Willetts promises to put students "in the driving seat"

Universities in England will have to compete against each other and private providers for a quarter of their student places.

Universities Minister David Willetts has published plans to increase market forces in higher education in England.

Promising to put "students in the driving seat", he also announced there would be 20,000 places reserved for degrees with fees of less than £7,500.

Labour's Gareth Thomas said the plans meant a "race to the bottom".

The shadow universities minister told MPs that this was a "desperate drive to cut fees, no matter what the cost to quality".

The controversial plan to create extra places for privately-funded individuals has also resurfaced - on the basis that it will be restricted to those sponsored by a business or a charity.

There are also proposals to allow students to repay their loans early, although the government is still consulting on the detail.

This is a politically sensitive suggestion which raises the prospect of better-off students not paying as much as those who pay back their loans over several decades.

Private providers

Mr Willetts said the reform package would "open up the system" and "put power where it belongs - in the hands of students".

Analysis

The market economy in higher education will mean students have to be treated as valued customers. Because, after all, they're paying the bill.

But is the "customer is always right" the best starting point for a university system?

University leaders have raised concerns about instilling instability rather than competitive energy.

If a subject falls out of fashion for a couple of years, should be it be abandoned?

Rather than wanting to compete for extra places, some university leaders talk privately about retreating to a smaller number of subject areas where they know they can attract a reliable number of students.

It's a move from the supermarket to the boutique.

And universities want to be places of ideas, ideals and academic excellence, but they also need to attract young people willing and able to pay up to £9,000 per year.

Are they going to be trading in lifestyle and leisure experiences as much as the old-fashioned currency of learning?

This White Paper promises to put the students into the driving seat of higher education - but it can't control where they are going to take it.

The White Paper, called Students at the Heart of the System, details plans to make universities bid for a proportion of their places - a higher proportion than had been anticipated.

This raises the prospect that while some universities will expand, others will lose student places.

Mr Willetts said that no government could offer a guarantee that courses or even institutions might not close as a result.

This proportion of universities bidding for places is "just the start", said Mr Willetts. "We want to extend the system so more places are contestable."

From 2012, universities will be able to offer unlimited places for students achieving AAB grades at A-level or better - regardless of the total student quotas they have been allocated.

This will encourage top universities to compete for the 65,000 students each year who attain these grades.

There will also be 20,000 places allocated on the basis of "good quality" and "value for money" at institutions charging an average of £7,500 or less per year.

Since a high proportion of universities have announced fees above this level, these places could be taken by an expanded private sector or courses provided through further education colleges.

Sir Steve Smith, president of the vice-chancellors' body Universities UK, warned that this "must not undermine the quality of the higher education system".

University title

In terms of improving social mobility, there had been discussion of changing the admissions system to allow applications after students knew their exam results - which previous official reports had recommended as fairer.

UNIVERSITY CHANGES

  • Universities to compete for 65,000 places for pupils with AAB grades at A-level
  • 20,000 places reserved for degrees with fees of £7,500 or less
  • Universities will have to publish information about students' employment chances and salaries
  • Inspections triggered if concerns raised about teaching standards
  • Student charter setting out consumer rights
  • Wider role for private sector colleges and partnerships
  • Fewer restrictions on "university" title
  • Considering options on early loan repayments

But a decision on this - so-called "post qualification application" - will not be considered until a review reports back next year.

The White Paper also promises to reduce barriers to private providers entering higher education.

This includes a review of the use of the term "university" as a title.

And there will be an emphasis on improving the information available to students.

Last week the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) announced that universities would have to publish key information about courses, such as the average salary of former students, the cost of accommodation, teaching hours and satisfaction ratings from previous students.

There will also be plans for inspections to be triggered if there are concerns about the quality of courses or teaching standards.

'Potential chaos'

But students were unimpressed.

Aaron Porter, president of the National Union of Students said: "Fees have been tripled and students have been exposed to the potential chaos of the market and yet there are still no concrete proposals for how quality, accountability and access will be improved."

University change will lead to higher drop out rate in England says Labour

Lecturers also attacked the proposals as an attempt by the government to recover from having lost control of fee levels.

"Trying to force down the cost of a degree after the government got its sums wrong will not solve the funding crisis it created," said Sally Hunt, leader of the University and College Union.

Professor Les Ebdon, chair of university think-tank Million+ said there was no evidence that competition would improve the student experience.

"A mini-market in 'AAB' students could favour students from independent schools and actually constrain a university's ability to widen access," he said.

Dr Wendy Piatt, of the Russell Group of leading universities, said she agreed that universities with high demand for courses from highly-qualified students should be allowed to expand.

But she warned that "such a very selective" lifting of the places cap could make it harder for some universities to maintain teaching in strategically important subjects like sciences and languages.

Professor Paul Welling, of the 1994 group of research intensive universities, said the government needed to avoid driving down standards by auctioning students to low cost institutions.

"We should not encourage higher education providers to short change students by cutting corners."

Competition on price will not affect Scottish students in Scotland's universities where there are no tuition fees. In Wales there are plans for Welsh students at Welsh universities to receive a subsidy covering increased tuition fees.

A decision on tuition fees and support for students at Northern Ireland's universities is expected in the autumn.

2011年6月19日星期日

U.K. Weighs Privatizing Administrative Services

U.K. Weighs Privatizing Administrative Services


The U.K. is preparing a major push to increase the use of the private sector in operating government back offices as part of its attempts to cut public spending, people familiar with the matter said.

Francis Maude, the minister charged with squeezing efficiencies out of the public sector, is examining back-office areas that can be privatized, such as administration of the state pension and National Health Service prescriptions. The private sector's involvement in the wider NHS back office is also expected to increase.

The drive to privatize such functions could hit tough opposition, however.

The government has already encountered difficulties in its efforts to bring private competition into front-office functions, like the NHS. Attempts to bring the private sector even further into the back office will likely kick off union reaction at a time when the U.K. faces the prospect of a round of public-sector strikes over issues such as job losses and rights.

"Privatization of back office is something we expect and will oppose," said Richard Simcox, a spokesman for the Public and Commercial Services Union.

On Friday, the government got an early taste of that opposition when civil servants who administer the state pension went on strike over proposals to mutualize their department, which will allow holders of pensions to take a stake—but which unions call privatization by the back door.

Earlier this month thousands of civil servants voted to strike as a protest against pension changes.

The government hopes to release a major consultation document on public-sector reform before August. That will include what the government sees as radical ideas, such as people being given individual budgets to pay for public services, like care for the elderly, rather than having civil servants decide how all the budget is spent.

In the new push, government officials have asked private-sector companies to pitch ideas on how they can help run state-run back offices, one person familiar with the matter said. Officials believe that, given their steady cash flows, back-office functions could be marketed to companies seeking dependable returns.

As part of attempts to reduce spending, government departments have had their budgets slashed, some by as much as a third, and some believe outsourcing back-office functions may save money over time, another person said.

A spokeswoman for Mr. Maude didn't return phone calls.

With a budget deficit of over 8%, the government wants private-sector companies to compete with public-sector services in a bid to increase efficiencies, drive down costs and offer greater choice.

Rolling back the state is also a longtime ideological aim of Prime Minister David Cameron's Conservative Party. Last week, though, Mr. Cameron had to water down a banner attempt to bring greater competition into the NHS, after doctors and the public accused the government of trying to privatize the health service.

Despite Mr. Cameron's stalled NHS reform, the health service is one area in which the government has already experimented with allowing the private sector to run back offices. NHS Shared Business Services is jointly owned by the NHS and business-services company Steria. It handles finance, accounting, and other human-resource functions, as well as some procurement for the health-care provider.

John Neilson, its chief executive, says the venture will increase its share of the NHS back-office work. "Over time, it will widen," he said.

NHS SBS currently works for 40% of NHS Trusts, the operational units that deliver NHS care. By the end of the year, Mr. Neilson says, he believes he will work for over half of them, and that this work will be brought across to the bodies that will succeed the Trusts under the government's current reforms to the health service. Mr. Neilson estimates his unit saved the Treasury some £70 million ($113 million) from 2005 to the start of 2010.

Mr. Neilson said he also expects his company to move into other back-office functions like data management.

He says this sort of private-sector involvement in the back office is almost unique to the U.K., though more recently several other European countries have discussed with NHS SBS the possibility of setting up similar models in their countries.

Britain's last government took an even more radical look at privatizing back-office work, and explored bundling government activities such as human resources and information-technology management into commercial companies and selling or listing them.

The British public sector manages an asset base valued at well over £800 billion, according to the Treasury.

2011年6月10日星期五

肺結核又現 倫敦如臨大敵

說起肺結核,總讓人覺得那是古代的事,不會發生在現代,但事實不然。英國倫敦感染肺結核人數大幅增加,英國公共衛生單 位開始設立移動X光車,檢驗病患,並考慮對給所有新生兒施打肺結核疫苗。曾在19世紀被稱為白色瘟疫的肺結核,一度消聲匿跡,現在竟在歐洲捲土重來,倫敦 是西歐國家中最多肺結核案例的地區,過去10年來,倫敦肺結核患者增加了50%,倫敦遊民罹患的比例尤其高,英國公共衛生部因此派出X光攝影巡迴車,加強 篩檢。

英國公共衛生部門已擬定對付肺結核的初步計劃,其中包括所有倫敦的新生兒都必須強制施打肺結核疫苗,此外也要制定標準化的篩檢流程。

X光攝影巡迴車自2005年上路以來,已有5萬多人做過肺部攝影,為了及早找出可能的患者,有的遊民之家甚至提供相當於台幣230元的優惠券,鼓勵他們前來照片子,但更大的挑戰在於治療,必須說服病患接受連續6個月的密集治療,中斷治療的人,身上的肺結核菌很容易產生抗藥性。(民視新聞黃彗澤綜合報導)