 加沙一名老人望著被以色列炸成廢墟的樓房 |
英國廣播公司BBC拒絕播放慈善組織呼吁為加沙募捐的宣傳短片，引起越來越多人的批評，英國聖公會(Church of England)也抨擊了BBC。
由數家大型慈善組織聯合組成的英國慈善機構 - 災難緊急委員會 (Disaster Emergency Committee)最近在全英國發起為加沙募捐活動，請求BBC播放他們制作的一個宣傳募捐短片，但是遭BBC拒絕。
BBC行政總裁湯普森說，播放這段宣傳片將影響公眾對BBC客觀和公正報道加沙衝突的信心。
英國聖公會約克大主教森塔穆對此作出反駁。他說現在的問題不是新聞報道的客觀公正，而是事關人道。
他說：“這不是哈馬斯要求人們捐助武器，而是災難緊急委員會提出募捐請求。BBC拒絕了他們，就等于選擇了（對加沙沖突的）立場，背棄了客觀公正。”
與BBC一同拒絕播放宣傳片的英國獨立電視（ITV）已經改變初衷，決定星期一（1月26日）與第四頻道(Channel Four)和第五頻道(Channel Five)兩家電視台一同播放宣傳片。
天空電視(Sky) 則表示，他們仍在考慮是否播出。
星期六，BBC位於倫敦市中心的廣播大樓門外發生了抗議BBC的示威。
警方說有至少2000人參與了示威，有7人被警方逮捕。
BBC Assailed for Refusing to Carry Gaza Appeal
Frantzesco Kangaris/Agence France-Presse
Protestors of the BBC's decision took to the streets of London on Saturday.
Published: January 26, 2009
LONDON — In more than 80 years as a publicly financed broadcaster with an audience of millions at home and around the world, the BBC has rarely been buffeted as severely as it has in recent days over its decision not to broadcast a television appeal by aid agencies for victims of Israel’s recent military actions in Gaza.
Skip to next paragraph 
Andy Rain/European Pressphoto Agency
A demonstration in central London on Saturday.
Anthony Devlin/Press Association, via Associated Press
Demonstrators conducted a sit-in at BBC headquarters on Monday to protest the broadcaster’s refusal to carry a video appeal for relief aid for Gazans.
BBC executives made the decision late last week and defiantly reaffirmed it on Monday, citing their concern with protecting the corporation’s impartiality in the Arab-Israeli dispute.
The dispute stirs high passions here, and the BBC, like other news organizations, has struggled uneasily for years to strike a balance, even as some critics claim it has tilted heavily toward Israel and others claim it has favored the Palestinians.
The three-week Israeli campaign in Gaza that ended nine days ago had already elicited a fresh barrage of complaints about BBC bias, for and against Israel. But the decision to block the aid appeal had the effect of magnifying the protests, and their virulence.
The decision has met with angry criticism from Church of England archbishops, editorial writers and senior British government ministers, as well as sit-ins at the BBC’s London headquarters and its broadcast center in Glasgow.
News planning sessions at the BBC have featured heated exchanges among editors and reporters, and BBC officials said Monday that they had received more than 11,000 complaints in the past three days.
A strong undercurrent in many of the protests has been that the BBC gave in to pressure from Israel or Jewish groups, which the BBC has vehemently denied.
A more common view has been that BBC executives, already wary because of a recent series of embarrassments unrelated to Middle East coverage, became so averse to controversy that they made an awkward extension of the concept of impartiality to a purely humanitarian issue.
But the BBC’s director general, Mark Thompson, denied Monday to reporters that he had been subjected to “arm-twisting” by pro-Israeli groups and said that the corporation had a duty to cover the Gaza dispute in a “balanced, objective way.”
“Of course, everyone is struck by the human consequence of what has happened,” he said. “And we will, I promise you, continue to report that as fully and compassionately as we can. But we are going to do that in a way where we can hold it up to scrutiny. It’s our job as journalists.”
The three-minute video, which was shown on several other channels in Britain on Monday night, was prepared by the Disasters Emergency Committee, an organization representing 11 relief agencies. Among them are many of Britain’s best-known charities, including the Red Cross, Oxfam, Save the Children, Help the Aged, Christian Aid and World Vision.
The committee has said the money it raises will buy food, medical supplies, tents, blankets and other necessities for those suffering in Gaza in the wake of the Israeli offensive and the military actions of Hamas, the militant Palestinian group that governs Gaza.
It asked broadcasters to show the appeal as a public service.
The BBC does not accept advertising but has shown humanitarian appeals on other issues, including the conflicts in Rwanda, Congo and Darfur. But to broadcast the appeal for aid to Gaza, BBC executives said, might compromise the impartiality of its Middle East coverage.
“We worry about being seen to endorse something which could give people the impression that we were backing one side,” Mr. Thompson said on the BBC’s Web site.
Some of the sharpest criticism of the BBC’s decision on the Gaza appeal came from within its own ranks, from unions representing its newsroom staff and from retired editors and reporters.
Sir John Tusa, a former head of the BBC World Service, said the scenes of distressed children and families in Gaza captured in the video appeal were a matter of “common humanity.”
“Nobody, surely, in their right mind, can say that is being partial towards the victims, as if somehow they deserved the fate they got,” he said in a BBC radio interview.
“The thing that worries me,” he added, “is that there is now an overcomplication of regulation and compliance and policy, and that in the course of that, common sense, and, I regret to say, humanity, seem to have been left behind.”
The BBC was joined in its refusal to carry the appeal by Sky News, an independent broadcaster with a widely watched news channel. But three other broadcasters — the publicly owned Channel 4 and two private broadcasters, ITV and Channel 5 — accepted the appeal. As shown on Monday night, the video focused heavily on the plight of Palestinian children — small boys and girls wounded and sobbing, being rushed into hospital emergency wards and, at one point, a parent clutching a tiny white shroud. Other scenes were of apartment blocks collapsed into piles of twisted steel and rubble.
“The children of Gaza are suffering,” the narrator said. “Many are struggling to survive, homeless or in need of food and water.”
Then, as if answering the view that the video amounted to anti-Israeli propaganda, he said: “Today, this is not about the rights and wrongs of the conflict. These people simply need your help.”
Unless we are prepared to use the power of Government to get lending going again then the problems will simply be compounded as more and more firms get into difficulties 
